Insights  /  Syncro alternatives: when the per-user bundle costs more than the stack it replaced

Insights

Syncro alternatives: when the per-user bundle costs more than the stack it replaced

Insights By The Helios team  ·  6 min read

Syncro's original pitch was sound: fold RMM, PSA and billing into one subscription and stop paying three vendors to argue with each other. The problem is the meter. Everything in that subscription is priced per user, and technicians are the one input a growing MSP cannot avoid adding. The search for a Syncro alternative almost always starts the day a new hire's start date collides with an invoice, whether the machines you manage belong to clients or to your own company. This piece runs the arithmetic at two, four and six technicians, sorts the alternatives by what they meter instead of headcount, and is honest about the billing features Syncro has that most of them, including Helios, do not.

What the per-user meter actually costs

Syncro's published plans sit at roughly 129 to 209 dollars per user per month, depending on tier and whether you commit annually. Every technician who needs to touch a ticket, a device or an invoice needs a seat. The arithmetic is not complicated, which is rather the point: you can do it on the back of the invoice that prompted the search.

TechniciansMonthly (low to high)Twelve months
2$258 to $418roughly $3,100 to $5,000
4$516 to $836roughly $6,200 to $10,000
6$774 to $1,254roughly $9,300 to $15,000

Two things follow from that table. First, hiring your fourth or fifth technician carries a tooling surcharge of 1,500 to 2,500 dollars a year before they have closed a single ticket. Second, the cost bears no relationship to the work. A six-person team managing 300 endpoints pays three times what a two-person team managing 300 endpoints pays, for the same monitoring, the same patching, the same agent on the same machines. The meter is measuring your payroll, not your estate. If you want to sanity-check where that lands as a share of revenue, we have written up how to model tooling costs as a percentage of MRR.

The new-hire test: if adding a technician raises your tooling bill by more than it raises your capacity in the first month, the pricing model is taxing growth. Per-user billing fails this test by construction.

Where the money goes

To be fair to Syncro, a chunk of that per-user fee buys things most RMM and PSA products do not attempt. Recurring contract billing, rate cards, payment collection through integrated processors, and a proper two-way sync with QuickBooks and Xero: for a lot of small MSPs, Syncro is the billing system, not just the ticketing system. If your invoicing runs through the platform, the seat price is buying accounting work as well as technical work, and any comparison that ignores that is a comparison with its thumb on the scale.

The question is whether you use it. Plenty of shops run their contracts and payments in QuickBooks, Xero or a dedicated billing tool anyway, either because they were doing so before Syncro or because the finance owner never trusted the migration. If that is you, the billing module is a feature you are paying for six times over and using zero times. Write down honestly which Syncro modules carry real workload before you shortlist anything. Deal-breakers live in that list, not in feature grids.

Every Syncro alternative meters something: pick your meter deliberately

There is no unmetered tooling. The choice is which variable your bill tracks, and whether that variable grows with your revenue or merely with your ambition.

  • Per-endpoint (NinjaOne, Datto RMM). The bill tracks devices instead of people, which suits teams that are hiring but not onboarding new estates. It punishes the opposite pattern: win a 150-endpoint client and your tooling cost jumps whether or not you added staff. Both vendors are also quote-led with minimums and annual terms, so the sticker is not the invoice; we covered the traps in escaping quote-only pricing and per-endpoint growth.
  • Per-technician, cheaper (Atera, SuperOps). Same meter as Syncro, lower rate, unlimited endpoints. This is a genuine saving if headcount is stable, but it is a rent reduction, not a change of landlord. The fourth hire still costs.
  • Per-agent PSA plus a separate RMM (HaloPSA plus something). Halo is a deeper PSA than Syncro's, with contract billing that finance owners tend to like. But you are back to two products, two agents' worth of integration work and two invoices, which is the stack Syncro was bought to collapse.
  • Flat fee banded by devices (Helios). One price per MSP, banded by estate size, every technician included. The meter is the band, so hiring is free and the bill only moves when the estate crosses a threshold. The trade-off is scope: young flat-fee products carry gaps, and you should hunt for them deliberately.

Model your own twelve months before you move

Do the sum with your numbers, not a vendor's example. It takes ten minutes.

  1. Count honestly. Technicians who need seats today, technicians you expect to hire inside twelve months, endpoints under management now, endpoints if your pipeline converts.
  2. Price each option at the twelve-month numbers, not today's. A quote that looks fine at four technicians and 200 endpoints may look very different at six and 350. Annual commitments lock you to the guess, so if you are unsure, weight monthly billing heavily.
  3. Add the modules you would have to replace. Leaving Syncro without a plan for recurring invoicing and payment collection is not a migration, it is an amputation. Price the replacement, whether that is Xero's own recurring invoices, a billing tool or Halo's contract engine, and add it to the alternative's column.
  4. Subtract the modules you never used. The same discipline in reverse. Nobody should pay per seat for a payments processor they do not run payments through.

Rule of thumb: compare twelve-month totals including replacement tooling, at the headcount and endpoint numbers you expect at renewal, not the ones on today's invoice. Any comparison done at today's numbers flatters the incumbent.

For the raw price checks across Atera, NinjaOne, Syncro, Datto and Halo, our RMM pricing comparison keeps dated figures you can lift straight into the model.

Where this fits with Helios

Helios merges RMM and PSA into one platform at a flat £99, £199 or £399 a month, banded by device count, with every feature on every plan, monthly billing and no notice period, so the new-hire test passes by design. It covers monitoring, Windows and third-party patching, Microsoft 365 and Defender, a full service desk with SLAs and a client portal, plus an AI agent that triages tickets and investigates alerts under approval guardrails. Be clear-eyed about the gap: Helios does not yet do recurring contract billing, rate cards or payment collection, only time tracking through to QuickBooks invoice export. If Syncro is your billing engine, model a replacement for that module before you switch; if it never was, the arithmetic above is the whole decision.

Helios is the flat-rate RMM and PSA for small MSPs and internal IT teams. 14-day trial, no card, no feature gating. Start free at heliosmsp.io.

Hold your own house to your clients' standard

Helios is an AI-native platform for MSPs and in-house IT teams: monitoring, patching, security and service desk in one place, with a 14-day trial and no feature gating.

Start free

Read next

Insights Datto RMM alternatives: getting out of a multi-year Kaseya contract Insights NinjaOne alternatives: escaping quote-only pricing and per-endpoint growth Insights The real cost of RMM: add-ons, minimums and hidden fees vendors leave off the pricing page